Source assessmentCore
Use of publicly available Generative AI tools in the Victorian public sector
Generative AI use in public sectorRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
VPS organisations should ensure their staff, contracted service providers and other personnel do not enter personal information into publicly available Generative AI tools.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
This guidance outlines the Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner’s (OVIC) position on the use of publicly available Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) tools within Victorian public sector organisations
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGenerative AI use in public sector
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded