Source assessmentSupporting
The urgency of robot trading regulation in Indonesia: Between innovation and investor protection
robot trading regulation in IndonesiaAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Such a framework should begin with a clear legal definition of robot trading, establish a tiered licensing and registration system, and set rigorous technical standards for algorithm testing, transparency, and operational safeguards.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Yoseph Reynaldo Gloria Passar Faculty of Law, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Faculty of Law, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot trading regulation in Indonesia
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded