The urgency of robot trading regulation in Indonesia: Between innovation and investor protection
This academic journal article examines the urgency of implementing specific legal regulations on robot trading in Indonesia to ensure investor protection and maintain market stability. It identifies legal gaps that have allowed unlicensed and fraudulent robot trading platforms to proliferate, and proposes a comprehensive regulatory framework involving tiered licensing, technical standards, transparency, and industry collaboration.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Policymakers, financial regulators, and researchers seeking guidance on regulating automated financial trading systems in emerging markets.
What the document contains
The paper addresses the legal vacuum surrounding automated trading systems in Indonesia, the history and risks of fraudulent robot trading schemes, and the structural design of a regulatory framework that balances innovation with investor protection and market stability.
Specific draft legislative text or detailed technical code requirements for trading algorithms.
- Indonesia lacks specific and comprehensive regulations governing robot trading, creating legal gaps exploited by fraudulent schemes.
- Unregulated automated trading systems pose systemic risks to market stability, including potential flash crashes and extreme volatility.
- A balanced regulatory framework requires clear legal definitions, tiered licensing, and rigorous technical standards for algorithms.
- Investor protection must be enforced through mandatory risk disclosures, truth-in-advertising rules, and enhanced public financial literacy.
- Collaboration between regulators, industry players, and international bodies is essential for effective oversight and cross-border enforcement.
· 1. Introduction · 1.2 Problem Formulation · 1.3 Objectives of Writing · 2. Research Methodology · 3. Results and Discussion · 3.1 The Urgency of the specific implementation regulations on robot trading in Indonesia to ensure investor protection and maintain market stability · 3.2 The most suitable regulatory framework to balance the advancement of robot trading innovation with the need for a safe, transparent, and fair trading ecosystem in Indonesia · 4. Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Fairness
4/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
By embedding principles of safety, transparency, and fairness into all stages of robot trading activity, Indonesia can create a resilient and trustworthy market environment.
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
screening score · 2026-10-24
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
screening score · 2026-10-24
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Effective enforcement is essential, supported by modern regulatory technology and strong sanctions to deter misconduct.
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24