Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Reporting on artificial intelligence: a handbook for journalism educators

Reporting on Artificial IntelligenceMultilateraldocument

Assessment outcome

total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The text identifies both the individual editor and UNESCO as the issuing body.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 802 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The page is about a handbook specifically focused on reporting on artificial intelligence.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It covers oversight, societal risks, and human rights violations related to AI deployments.

G4 · Attributablepass

The text identifies both the individual editor and UNESCO as the issuing body.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this handbook version has been superseded or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: The quote offers general direction and principles for reporting on AI without establishing binding steps.

Finding ways of reporting about AI in a nuanced, realistic and accountable manner

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Reporting on artificial intelligence: a handbook for journalism educators Jaakkola, Maarit UNESCO 2023 Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO

Currency

2/2

computed: newest date 2026-07-09 (via json-ld), ~0.3y old; within the 36-month standards_frameworks window for perspective 'Multilateral' → 2

Classification

Coverage topicReporting on Artificial Intelligence
PerspectiveMultilateral
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
Granularitydocument