Reporting on artificial intelligence: a handbook for journalism educators
This handbook for journalism educators, published by UNESCO, aims to inspire and empower journalism educators to help students and working journalists report accurately and critically on artificial intelligence. It covers machine intelligence, popular narratives, journalistic roles, and methods for nuanced reporting on AI technologies and their societal impacts. The publication is part of UNESCO's journalism education series and was supported by the International Programme for the Development of Communication.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Journalism educators, journalism students, and working journalists seeking guidance on reporting about artificial intelligence.
What the document contains
The handbook addresses the fundamentals of artificial intelligence for media professionals, the societal impacts of AI technologies, popular narratives surrounding automation, and methodologies for accountable and nuanced journalism regarding AI developments.
The text does not contain binding regulatory enforcement mechanisms, legal definitions for AI compliance, or specific technical codes of conduct for software developers.
- The handbook serves as a guide for journalism educators to help students and working journalists report on AI.
- It addresses understanding machine intelligence, identifying AI types, and exploring AI strengths, weaknesses, and potential.
- The publication emphasizes examining pervasive popular narratives that inform public consciousness about AI.
- It discusses journalism's role in mediating and shaping AI discourse in a nuanced, realistic, and accountable manner.
- The handbook was supported by UNESCO's International Programme for the Development of Communication.
· Understanding machine intelligence and identifying different types of AI · Exploring AI's potential, strengths, and weaknesses · Imagining diverse futures with AI by recognizing popular narratives · Understanding journalism's role in mediating and shaping AI discourse · Finding ways of reporting about AI in a nuanced, realistic, and accountable manner · Making connections to existing genres of journalism
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
1/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
Finding ways of reporting about AI in a nuanced, realistic and accountable manner
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Fairness
1/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
alert about aspects like exclusions, unequal benefits, and violations of human rights.
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Dignity
1/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
alert about aspects like exclusions, unequal benefits, and violations of human rights.
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Transparency
0/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-24