Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Regarding the Issue of the Essence of Legal Treatment and the Possibility of Granting Legal Status to a Robot in Civil Law

Legal status of robots in civil lawAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The text explicitly names the authors of the academic chapter.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 2: Published in a recognized academic book series by Springer, establishing peer-reviewed or academic status.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1263 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source primarily evaluates the legal status of robots and AI within civil law.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It discusses the legal treatment, regulations, and civil law status of robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

The text explicitly names the authors of the academic chapter.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this academic publication has been superseded or retracted.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: Description or analysis only, discussing legal treatment and status of robots without binding steps.

Authority

2/2

Score 2: Published in a recognized academic book series by Springer, establishing peer-reviewed or academic status.

In: Popkova, E. (eds) Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 826. Springer, Cham.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicLegal status of robots in civil law
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument