Source assessmentCore
The Guideline for Japanese Governments’ procurements and utilizations of generative AI for the sake of evolution and innovation of public administration
Generative AI procurement and utilizationRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 6/6 (actionability 2 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total6/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Providers and Users must properly report risk cases to the CAIO, and providers take appropriate countermeasures.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
The Guideline for Japanese Governments' procurements and utilizations of generative AI
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGenerative AI procurement and utilization
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded