Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

How to Use Virtue Ethics for Thinking About the Moral Standing of Social Robots: A Relational Interpretation in Terms of Practices, Habits, and Performance

moral standing of social robotsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 2/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 1)

Total2/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

International Journal of Social Robotics (2021) 13:31–40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00707-z How to Use Virtue Ethics for Thinking About the Moral Standing of Social Robots

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicmoral standing of social robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded