Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Criminal Liability for Crimes Committed by Artificial Intelligence Devices (Robots)

Criminal liability of AI and robotsAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

scientific research requires a method, so in our study we need to follow a specific method, and thus we will adopt the descriptive analytical method

Authority

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Soran University | Twejer | Volume:8, Issue:4, Nov 2025 Criminal Liability for Crimes Committed by Artificial Intelligence Devices (Robots) 3, Mohammed Faris Ali2Jamal Jalal Mustafa

Currency

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicCriminal liability of AI and robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded