Back to the database
Record STMT-WCD6EC2Aspirational

Criminal Liability for Crimes Committed by Artificial Intelligence Devices (Robots)

Report State lawWestern Asia · IQadopted

This academic journal article and study examines the criminal liability of artificial intelligence devices and robots under current and proposed legal frameworks. It analyzes whether robots can possess legal personality, awareness, or free will, and evaluates the applicability of traditional criminal law concepts and penalties. The paper concludes with a proposed draft law on crimes committed by robots, detailing liability rules for manufacturers, users, hackers, and robots themselves.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Soran UniversityAcademic
Lead issuer
University of NahrainAcademic
Co-issuer
Kurdistan Bar AssociationProfessional
Co-issuer
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentLegislatorsRegulators

Legal scholars, legislators, and policymakers should read this to understand how to adapt criminal law for crimes involving artificial intelligence and autonomous robots.

Sectors
Justice · criminal law and legal liabilityResearch and science · academic research

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the legal nature of robots, the criteria for establishing criminal liability for AI systems, the material and moral elements of robot-related crimes, and the suitability of traditional versus novel criminal penalties. It concludes with a comprehensive draft law detailing safety standards, hacking offenses, and specific punishments for robot-related harms.

What's missing

It lacks empirical analysis of ongoing international judicial cases outside of theoretical frameworks and hypothetical scenarios, and does not provide detailed technical cybersecurity specifications beyond high-level software security requirements.

Key takeaways
  • Robots currently lack awareness, perception, and free will, meaning they cannot possess true criminal intent or capacity.
  • Criminal liability for crimes committed by current robots rests with human actors such as manufacturers, programmers, owners, users, or hackers.
  • Traditional criminal penalties like imprisonment and the death penalty are incompatible with the non-material nature of robots.
  • If robots acquire artificial awareness in the future, specialized penalties like software deletion or temporary deactivation could be applied directly to them.
  • A specialized legislative framework is urgently needed to govern robot manufacturing, safety standards, and liability assignment.
Outline
1. Introduction
2. The Nature of the Robot and the Requirements for Establishing Criminal Liability for Robots
3. Objective Criminal Provisions for Robot Crimes
4. Conclusion and Recommendations with a Proposed Draft Law
Issued2 November 2025
Length11,717 words · 29 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

4/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Article 3- First / The robot that has artificial awareness: The robot bears legal responsibility for all damages it causes to others

Chapter Two / Legal Liability

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

1/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

protecting the rights of individuals and society and determining legal responsibility

Chapter One / Objectives and Applicability

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

2/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Thirdly / User or owner responsibility: He bears the criminal responsibility committed by the robot for all robot errors that it commits and were the result of guidance from the user.

Chapter Two / Legal Liability

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

4/5

Protection of personal data and private life

3/ Privacy and data protection: Robots must comply with data protection laws such as the regulation of personal data and users must have the right to consent

Chapter Three / Robot production standards

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Article 5: Manufacturers must provide transparent data on how robots work properly, including how decisions are made by them

Chapter Four / Transparency and monitoring

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Article 11: A robot with artificial awareness shall be punished with one of the following penalties, depending on the type of crime committed

Chapter Five / Penalties

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

criminal_liability robotics legal_personality artificial_intelligence penal_code