Source assessmentSupporting
Who Is Responsible? Social Identity, Robot Errors and Blame Attribution
social identity robot errors and blameAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 1 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability1/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
We therefore urge roboticists and designers to stay in an ongoing conversation about how social traits are conceptualised and implemented in this technology.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Samantha STEDTLER a,1 Marianna LEVENTI a a Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Sweden
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicsocial identity robot errors and blame
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded