Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism

robot moral status and ethical behaviourismAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The author of the article is explicitly named as John Danaher.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2. [quote matched canonical, not verbatim]

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2856 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The article is explicitly and primarily about whether robots can have significant moral status.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source discusses ethical duties, moral status, and normative frameworks for robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

The author of the article is explicitly named as John Danaher.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Anchor 0: Description and analysis only, presenting 'ethical behaviourism' and moral status theories without binding steps.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2. [quote matched canonical, not verbatim]

Sci Eng Ethics 26, 2023–2049 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicrobot moral status and ethical behaviourism
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page