Source assessmentSupporting
Vindicating the Three Laws of Robotics
AI safety and ethics principlesAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 2 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority0/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
1. For all feasible actions, including inaction, an AI must select the option that (absent informed, revocable, and competence-verified consent) keeps expected physical and psychological damage to each identifiable human below a designated threshold
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Article Not peer-reviewed version Vindicating the Three Laws of Robotics Izak Tait * Posted Date: 3 November 2025
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI safety and ethics principles
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded