Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Ethics of Compassionate Robots in Elementary Education

ethics of compassionate robots in educationAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named authors and institutions are clearly provided.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1: Published by reputable academic institutions (ACM/IEEE) in a conference proceeding.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1748 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The paper focuses specifically on social robots and AI ethics in education.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses ethics, moral responsibility, and governance dimensions of robots.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named authors and institutions are clearly provided.

G5 · In forcepass

No indicators of supersession or withdrawal appear on the page.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides principles and direction for evaluation, but does not name specific binding steps or obligations.

Ultimately, the framework offers a structured approach for evaluating whether, when, and how robots should express compassion in ways that are developmentally appropriate, culturally responsive, and aligned with students' lived experiences

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Published by reputable academic institutions (ACM/IEEE) in a conference proceeding.

Companion Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicethics of compassionate robots in education
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page