Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

To Be Trustworthy, the Robot Assisted Cervical Spine Surgery Needs More Than Accuracy Beyond Technological Limitations: Commentary on “Robotics in Cervical Spine Surgery: Feasibility and Safety of Posterior Screw Placement”

robot assisted cervical spine surgeryAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named author Yi Seong is clearly identified at the beginning of the commentary.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1423 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The text focuses primarily on robotic-assisted surgical systems and their accuracy.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source discusses FDA regulation and clinical safety requirements for robotic systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named author Yi Seong is clearly identified at the beginning of the commentary.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this commentary is superseded or retracted.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Level 1: Provides general direction and principles regarding surgeon understanding, but specifies no binding step or control.

Surgeons should understand the possible errors and consequences beyond robotic system

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Neurospine Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society PMC10323348

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicrobot assisted cervical spine surgery
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage5 Deploy
Layermodel
Granularitydocument