Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

The rule of law or the rule of robots? Nationally representative survey evidence from Kenya

AI in legal systems and judicial legitimacyAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Authored by named academic researchers.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 10293 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is entirely about artificial intelligence in the legal system.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses the rule of law, oversight, and policy regarding AI use in courts.

G4 · Attributablepass

Authored by named academic researchers.

G5 · In forcepass

No indication of repeal or supersession; assumed in force.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Level 0: The source provides descriptive analysis and survey findings only, naming no binding obligations or steps.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Information & Communications Technology Law ISSN: 1360-0834 (Print) 1469-8404 (Online) Journal homepage: www.tandfonline.com/journals/cict20 The rule of law or the rule of robots?

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicAI in legal systems and judicial legitimacy
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
Granularitydocument