Source assessmentSupporting
The Relational Sexual Self, Interhuman Sexuality & Sex Robot Ethics
sex robot ethics and relational selfAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Shimizu and Ooka formulate three safeguards necessary to responsibly guide the translation of friction from theory to practice: (1) ensuring a robust mechanism for consent of the user
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
COMMENTARY Philosophy & Technology (2026) 39:67 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01083-8 Abstract In this reply, we respond to Hayate Shimizu’s and Masaki Ooka’s commentary
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicsex robot ethics and relational self
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded