Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics

Legal responsibility and roboticsAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named author Susanne Beck and institutional affiliation are explicitly stated.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1864 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The article is explicitly about robotics, autonomous machines, and legal responsibility.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Addresses legal responsibility, rules, oversight, and policy regarding autonomous systems.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named author Susanne Beck and institutional affiliation are explicitly stated.

G5 · In forcepass

No text indicates that this published academic paper has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0. Description and analysis only regarding legal responsibility in robotics.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Beck, S. The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics. AI & Soc 31 , 473–481 (2016).

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicLegal responsibility and robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page
The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics · CEI AI Governance Database