Source assessmentSupporting
The Monstrous Posthuman: Ethical and Legal Responses to Cyborgs, Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Entities
legal personhood and AI monstrosityAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This article proposes that the cultural category of the monster – understood, in Cohen’s terms, as a figure historically mobilised to police the boundaries of the permissible and to delineate who may be included within a community – has long been entangled with practices of legal marginalisation and moral boundary-setting
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Published by Linköping University Electronic Press: http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.6139 The Monstrous Posthuman: Ethical and Legal Responses to Cyborgs, Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Entities Nicholae Bobaru Abstract As artificial intelligence
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topiclegal personhood and AI monstrosity
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded