The Contextual Autonomy Principle: When and Why Social Service Robots Are Perceived as Ethical
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
Named academic authors and institutions are explicitly credited for the research paper.
Score 2: Peer-reviewed academic research article published in Psychology & Marketing.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 12945 words of full text extracted
The source is entirely about social service robots, autonomy, and algorithmic service encounters.
The paper explicitly addresses governance forms, ethical oversight, and accountability in robotic systems.
Named academic authors and institutions are explicitly credited for the research paper.
There is no retraction or withdrawal notice on the page; it represents the published current version.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Score 0: Description and analysis only, with no binding step or obligation named.
Authority
2/2Score 2: Peer-reviewed academic research article published in Psychology & Marketing.
Psychology & Marketing Volume 43, Issue 11 pp. 3160-3177 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)