Source assessmentSupporting
The concept of social dignity as a yardstick to delimit ethical use of robotic assistance in the care of older persons
social dignity and robotic caregivingAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
This source has not been read into a full record yet; only the screening assessment is available.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
we argue for increased efforts in developing robots that would provide helpful assistance in certain ADLs
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (2022) 25:99–110 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10054-z SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicsocial dignity and robotic caregiving
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded