Autonomy as Concept in Robot Ethics
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 0 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
The authors are clearly named in the text.
Level 2: Published as a peer-reviewed or edited book chapter by Springer in an academic book series.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 1282 words of full text extracted
The paper focuses extensively on robotics and technical autonomy.
It directly addresses the ethical and legal implications of robotics.
The authors are clearly named in the text.
No indication of retraction or supersession is present on the page.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Level 0: The document is an academic description and analysis of technical autonomy without naming binding steps or obligations.
Authority
2/2Level 2: Published as a peer-reviewed or edited book chapter by Springer in an academic book series.
Funk, M., Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). (Technical) Autonomy as Concept in Robot Ethics. In: Pons, J. (eds) Inclusive Robotics for a Better Society. INBOTS 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 25. Springer, Cham.
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)