Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Subject (in) Trouble: Humans, Robots, and Legal Imagination

legal subjectivity and roboticsAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The author is explicitly named as Ana Oliveira in the metadata.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 386 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The paper focuses on robotics, high-tech robotics, and machines as the primary subject.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The source addresses legal subjectivity, normative problems, and rights concerning non-human agents.

G4 · Attributablepass

The author is explicitly named as Ana Oliveira in the metadata.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no evidence on the page that this version has been superseded or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0 because this is an academic description and analysis only, with no binding steps or obligations.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Title of the journal, periodical, book or event: Laws Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topiclegal subjectivity and robotics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page