Source assessmentCore
ISO policy brief: Harnessing international standards for responsible AI development and governance
international standards for responsible AI governanceStandards body
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
International standards: • Establish a common language and consensus- built definitions that accelerate innovation by enabling more productive collaboration among AI developers, deployers, governments and regulators, and other important stakeholders.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
This publication was developed by the ISO Central Secretariat (ISO/CS), with overall leadership provided by Cindy Parokkil of the Capacity Building Unit, and with oversight from Erich Kieck, Director of the Unit.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicinternational standards for responsible AI governance
PerspectiveStandards body
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded