Rights-Bearers vs. Rites-Bearers: A Confucian Cross-Cultural Perspective
Assessment outcome
total 3/4 (actionability 1 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 4.5/6
Authorship & scope
The article is authored by Tae Wan Kim and Alan Strudler.
Level 2: Published in Communications of the ACM, establishing peer-reviewed or official academic venue status.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 7105 words of full text extracted
The article is primarily about robots, AI entities, and how humans should treat them.
It discusses ethical treatment, moral status, and legal implications regarding robots.
The article is authored by Tae Wan Kim and Alan Strudler.
There is no retraction or repeal notice present on the page.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides philosophical direction on robot ethics, but specifies no binding step or actionable implementation standard.
namely, do not grant rights to robots, grant only role-obligations
Authority
2/2Level 2: Published in Communications of the ACM, establishing peer-reviewed or official academic venue status.
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM | JUNE 2023 | VOL. 66 | NO. 6 review articles
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)