Source assessmentCore
Should my robot know what’s best for me? Human–robot interaction between user experience and ethical design
Human-robot interaction and ethical designAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Combining user experience and ethical perspectives, we propose adjustments to the original design principles and canvass our own design recommendations for a positive and ethically acceptable social human–robot interaction design.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Should my robot know what’s best for me? Human–robot interaction between user experience and ethical design Nora Fronemann1 · Kathrin Pollmann1 · Wulf Loh2 Received: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 25 March 2021 / Published online: 28 April 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract To integrate social robots in real-life contexts, it is crucial that they are accepted by the users.
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicHuman-robot interaction and ethical design
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded