Source assessmentSupporting
Robots replacing human arbitrators: the legal dilemma
Robots replacing human arbitratorsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
This paper argues that the current day laws do not provide for robots to replace the human arbitrator, and must retain the status quo.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Information and Communications Technology Law, 34 (2). pp. 129-145
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicRobots replacing human arbitrators
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded