Source assessmentSupporting
Robots in surgery: who should be held criminally responsible
criminal liability in robotic surgeryAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Научная статья УДК 343 https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2023-3-80-84 Роботы в хирургии: кто должен нести уголовную ответственность Черных Евгения Евгеньевна Национальный исследовательский Нижегородский государственный университет имени Н. И. Лобачевского
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topiccriminal liability in robotic surgery
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded