Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Robots for Care: Exploring Downstream Socio-ethical Effects and Upstream Interventions

Robots for care assistive ethicsAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

Named authors and academic institutions are explicitly listed as responsible for the work.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Score 1: Published as a conference proceeding by professional academic associations (ACM/IEEE).

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 2096 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source is an academic workshop explicitly about deploying robots in clinical and assistive contexts.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It addresses ethical and social governance risks associated with assistive robotics deployment.

G4 · Attributablepass

Named authors and academic institutions are explicitly listed as responsible for the work.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this current version has been superseded or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0: The document provides descriptions and analysis of downstream effects and workshop goals without naming binding steps or obligations.

Authority

1/2

Score 1: Published as a conference proceeding by professional academic associations (ACM/IEEE).

HRI Companion '26: Companion Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction March 2026

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicRobots for care assistive ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page