Source assessmentSupporting
Technology at Work v2.0: The Future Is Not What It Used to Be
AI and robot rightsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Christopher Markou Leverhulme Fellow and Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI and robot rights
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded