Robotic systems implementation into law enforcement practice and peculiarities of decision-making models in such systems
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 2 + authority 0 + currency 2)
Authorship & scope
The paper explicitly names the author and his academic affiliation at the beginning of the article.
Level 0: Academic conference paper by an individual author (K M Kholostov), not a recognized standard or government document.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 3542 words of full text extracted
The paper focuses specifically on artificial intelligence technologies, decision-making models, and algorithms for security and law enforcement robots.
Addresses safety, legal operation, rules, prohibitions, restrictions, and regulatory frameworks for autonomous security robots in law enforcement.
The paper explicitly names the author and his academic affiliation at the beginning of the article.
There is no text on the page indicating that this published conference paper has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2Level 2: Names a specific obligation for manufacturers to create a unified knowledge base. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]
to ensure safety and reliability, manufacturers and developers of security robotic equipment are to create a unified knowledge base, including rules, prohibitions, and restrictions
Authority
0/2Level 0: Academic conference paper by an individual author (K M Kholostov), not a recognized standard or government document.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Robotic systems implementation into law enforcement practice and peculiarities of decision- making models in such systems To cite this article: K M Kholostov 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1958 012021
Currency
2/2computed: newest date 2026-10-24 (via pdf-meta), ~0.0y old; within the 60-month academic_research window for perspective 'Academic' → 2