Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Robot Trustworthiness: Guidelines for Simulated Emotion

Robot Trustworthiness and EmotionAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6

Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The text clearly names the author and issuing organization.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1: Published in a conference proceedings by ACM/IEEE, representing a reputable institution acting officially.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 1461 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source focuses on artificial intelligence, autonomous robots, and simulated emotion systems.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It discusses robot trustworthiness, human-agent interaction, and evaluation of agent reliability.

G4 · Attributablepass

The text clearly names the author and issuing organization.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded or withdrawn.

Scored criteria

Actionability

1/2

Anchor 1: The paper outlines non-binding principles and direction to guide robotic simulation of emotion rather than enforceable obligations.

This paper discusses these three factors as principles to guide robotic simulation of emotion for increasing human ability to make reasonable assessments of robot trustworthiness

Authority

1/2

Level 1: Published in a conference proceedings by ACM/IEEE, representing a reputable institution acting officially.

Published In HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicRobot Trustworthiness and Emotion
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
Granularitytopic page