Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Robot Policing, Who will be Responsible for the Robotpolice's Ethical use on Making Decision? (Consideration of the Ethical Framework)

Robot policing and AI ethicsAcademictopic page

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The academic paper clearly names Jinsoon Song as the author and affiliated institution.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 9812 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

The source primarily discusses AI and algorithmic systems in the context of robot policing and decision-making.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

It thoroughly addresses ethical frameworks, regulations, algorithmic bias, and governance of AI in law enforcement.

G4 · Attributablepass

The academic paper clearly names Jinsoon Song as the author and affiliated institution.

G5 · In forcepass

There is no indication on the page that this published academic article has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Description or analysis only. Anchor 0.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

OMNES J Multicult Soc. 2023 Jul;13(2):48-80. English. Published online Jul 31, 2023.

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicRobot policing and AI ethics
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
Granularitytopic page