RoboDoc: Critical ethical issues to consider for the design and development of a robotic doctor experience
Assessment outcome
total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6
Authorship & scope
The source clearly names the authors and their institutional affiliations.
Score 1; published in a reputable journal by IOS Press as an academic article, but lacks explicit peer-review status in text. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 3370 words of full text extracted
The paper focuses specifically on medical robotics and AI doctor interactions, fulfilling the primary subject requirement.
The text discusses ethical, legal, and safety governance considerations regarding medical robotics.
The source clearly names the authors and their institutional affiliations.
There is no indication on the page that this version has been superseded or withdrawn.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2Score 0 (description or analysis only); discusses ethical and design considerations without naming binding obligations or specific rules.
To introduce a robot surgeon would require a holistic safety and ethical measures such as during a hypothetical scenario of complications, who is responsible?
Authority
1/2Score 1; published in a reputable journal by IOS Press as an academic article, but lacks explicit peer-review status in text. [quote matched fuzzy, not verbatim]
This article is published in Journal of Future Robot Life . View All Journal Metrics Publication usage
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)