Source assessmentSupporting
Responsible Robots and AI Via Moral Conditioning
robot moral conditioning and responsibility gapAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
For the scope of this paper, we will focus mainly on the Foundation of Care/Harm due to its straightforward implementation compared to the other 5 rulebooks.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Online Journal of Robotics & Automation Technology Research Article Copyright © All rights are reserved by Dongbin Lee This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicrobot moral conditioning and responsibility gap
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layermodel
GranularityNot recorded