Source assessmentSupporting
Research on the Criminal Law Regulation of Crimes Caused by Out-of-Control Intelligent Robot Programs
Criminal law regulation of intelligent robotsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
For users and regulators, it is recommended to strengthen the regulation of foresight obligations for the crime of losing control of intelligent robot programs, in order to reduce the risk of illegal activities caused by program failures.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Paradigm Academic Press Law and Economy ISSN 2788-7049 APR. 2024 VOL.3, NO.4 63 Research on the Criminal Law Regulation of Crimes Caused by Out-of-Control Intelligent Robot Programs Jingsen Yang1 1 School of Economics and Law, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, China
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicCriminal law regulation of intelligent robots
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded