Back to assessments
Source assessmentSupporting

Redefining Safety in Light of Human-Robot Interaction: A Critical Review of Current Standards and Regulations

robotics safety standards and regulationAcademic

Assessment outcome

total 3/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 1)

Total3/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency1/2

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuer authority (evidence)

No evidence recorded for this source.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

Passed in screening.

G2 · AI nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

Passed in screening.

G4 · Attributablepass

Passed in screening.

G5 · In forcepass

Passed in screening.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

No rationale recorded.

Authority

2/2

No rationale recorded.

Edited by: Maria Chiara Leva, Technological University Dublin, Ireland Reviewed by: Rajagopalan Srinivasan, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India

Currency

1/2

No rationale recorded.

Classification

Coverage topicrobotics safety standards and regulation
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded
Redefining Safety in Light of Human-Robot Interaction: A Critical Review of Current Standards and Regulations · CEI AI Governance Database