Prudential reasons for designing entitled chatbots: How robot "rights" can improve human well-being
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
The text explicitly names the authors who stand behind the paper.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 10792 words of full text extracted
The primary subject of the article is AI, specifically robots, chatbots, and large language models.
The source addresses rules, oversight, and ethical/prudential governance angles regarding AI design and robot rights.
The text explicitly names the authors who stand behind the paper.
There is no evidence on the page indicating that this version has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides general direction and principles regarding chatbot design without establishing specific, binding obligations or steps to follow.
In Sect. 4 , we propose several normative design features that the chatbot operating of the future should have to help us flourish.
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Ai and Ethics AI Ethics PMC12208972 12208972 12208972 40606213 10.1007/s43681-025-00676-x Prudential reasons for designing entitled chatbots: How robot "rights" can improve human well-being Löhr Guido 1 ✉ Dennis Matthew 2 1 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)