Source assessmentContext only
Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject
AI robots as legal subjectsAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 1/6 (actionability 0 + authority 0 + currency 1)
Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority0/2
Currency1/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
0/2No rationale recorded.
Faculty of Law Universitas Tarumanagara Tangerang, Indonesia yuwonop@fh.untar.ac.id Viony Kresna Sumantri Faculty of Law Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta Barat, Indonesia vio.kresna@gmail.com
Currency
1/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI robots as legal subjects
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded