Source assessmentContext only
Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI’s Beneficial Use as a Professional Tool
AI governance and legal services in GhanaIndustry
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 0)
Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Thus, notwithstanding the absence of express provisions on the use of AI systems in the legislation governing the legal profession, practitioners ought to be guided by the duty of confidentiality in the use of clients’ data in AI systems.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
IBA Alternative and New Law Business Structures Committee
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI governance and legal services in Ghana
PerspectiveIndustry
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded