Source assessmentSupporting
Future of Malaysia’s AI Governance
Malaysia AI governance and policyCivil-society/NGO
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
First, Malaysia should not pursue hard regulations in haste. At the current stage, due processes would have to be constructed for legislation
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
Written by Farlina Said and Farah Nabilah White paper I S I S Institute of Strategic & International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicMalaysia AI governance and policy
PerspectiveCivil-society/NGO
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded