Source assessmentSupporting
EU guidelines on ethics in artificial intelligence: Context and implementation
EU guidelines on ethics in AIMultilateral
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 2 + authority 1 + currency 0)
Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
To make sure that an AI system does not hamper EU fundamental rights, a fundamental rights impact assessment should be undertaken prior to its development.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
BRIEFING EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Tambiama Madiega Members' Research Service PE 640.163 – September 2019
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicEU guidelines on ethics in AI
PerspectiveMultilateral
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded