Source assessmentSupporting
Narrative Approaches to Human–Robot Interaction and the Law
Human-robot interaction and legal narrativeAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 4/6 (actionability 0 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total4/6
Actionability0/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
0/2No rationale recorded.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Published online by Cambridge University Press
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicHuman-robot interaction and legal narrative
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded