Back to assessments
Source assessmentContext only

Medical liability in paediatric robotic surgery – a current concept and a literature review

Medical liability in robotic surgeryAcademicdocument

Assessment outcome

total 1/4 (actionability 0 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 1.5/6

Total1/6
Actionability0/2
Authority1/2
Currency—

Authorship & scope

Attribution (G4 evidence)

The source lists named authors and academic affiliations.

Issuer authority (evidence)

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.

Eligibility gates

G1 · Retrievablepass

HTTP 200, 6668 words of full text extracted

G2 · AI nexuspass

AI integration and algorithmic liability are central topics discussed throughout the paper.

G3 · Governance nexuspass

The paper directly addresses medico-legal liabilities, governance, rules, and risk management.

G4 · Attributablepass

The source lists named authors and academic affiliations.

G5 · In forcepass

No text on the page indicates that this version has been superseded, retracted, or repealed.

Scored criteria

Actionability

0/2

Score 0. Description and analysis of medical liability without binding steps or specific obligations.

Authority

1/2

Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1863-2483 1863-2491 pmc-is-collection-domain yes pmc-collection-title Springer PMC13638718

Currency

—

computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)

Classification

Coverage topicMedical liability in robotic surgery
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
Granularitydocument