Source assessmentContext only
Mauritius Artificial Intelligence Strategy
National AI strategy and roadmapRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 2/6 (actionability 1 + authority 1 + currency 0)
Total2/6
Actionability1/2
Authority1/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
For Artificial Intelligence to have the required impact described above, there is a need to set up the Mauritius Artificial Intelligence Council (MAIC) made up of say 10 main members which will facilitate and oversee project implementation as well as quantifying the socio -economic impact.
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
The report stems from deli berations held within the Working Group on AI, which is one of the three working groups reporting to a steering committee, set up under the Chairmanship of the Secretary to the Cabinet
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicNational AI strategy and roadmap
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded