Kantianism for the Ethics of Human–Robot Interaction
Assessment outcome
total 2/4 (actionability 1 + authority 1); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 3.0/6
Authorship & scope
The paper is authored by Hayate Shimizu from Hokkaido University.
Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
HTTP 200, 9778 words of full text extracted
The source is about applying Kantian ethics to artificial intelligence and human-robot interaction.
It addresses ethical rules, norms, and moral oversight regarding AI and human-robot relationships.
The paper is authored by Hayate Shimizu from Hokkaido University.
There is no indication on the page that this version is superseded or repealed.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2Level 1: Provides general principles and direction regarding treatment of robots without mandating binding, enforceable implementation steps.
we should avoid treating robots badly
Authority
1/2Level 1 (capped): the quote establishes a journal venue but does not establish the peer-review status required for Level 2.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Philosophy & Technology (2025) 38:109 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00941-1 Abstract This paper explores the implications of applying Kantianism
Currency
—computed: no publish/modified date found on the page (never guessed)