Source assessmentCore
AI Safety Institute
AI Safety Institute overviewRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
Developers both have responsibility to devise and conduct safety testing through evaluations, transparency, and other appropriate measures, and the technical means of mitigating risks and addressing vulnerabilities.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology by Command of His Majesty. November 2023 CP 960 E03012924 ISBN: 978-1-5286-4538-6
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAI Safety Institute overview
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded