Source assessmentCore
Improving Public Engagement with Ethical Complexities of Assistive Robots
Assistive robot ethics and public engagementAcademic
Assessment outcome
total 5/6 (actionability 1 + authority 2 + currency 2)
Total5/6
Actionability1/2
Authority2/2
Currency2/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
1/2No rationale recorded.
In this paper we present EETAS, a methodology for using structured workshops to improve public understanding of assistive robot ethical complexities.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
First Online: 24 August 2023 Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS,volume 1882)
Currency
2/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicAssistive robot ethics and public engagement
PerspectiveAcademic
Lifecycle stage1 Plan & design
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded