Source assessmentSupporting
Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa AI Principles
Trustworthy AI Principles Aotearoa New ZealandCivil-society/NGO
Assessment outcome
total 3/6 (actionability 2 + authority 1 + currency 0)
Total3/6
Actionability2/2
Authority1/2
Currency0/2
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Designers, developers and users of AI systems (AI stakeholders) must respect: • Applicable laws in New Zealand and other relevant jurisdictions • Human rights recognised under domestic and international law
Authority
1/2No rationale recorded.
To help maintain public trust in the development and use of AI in New Zealand, the Law, Society and Ethics Working Group of the AI Forum has published a set of guiding principles
Currency
0/2No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicTrustworthy AI Principles Aotearoa New Zealand
PerspectiveCivil-society/NGO
Lifecycle stageN/A cross-cutting
Layerboth
GranularityNot recorded