Source assessmentCore
Guidelines for Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Courts and Tribunals
Generative AI in courtsRegulatory/legal
Assessment outcome
total 4/4 (actionability 2 + authority 2); currency unscored, so pro-rated to 6.0/6
Total4/6
Actionability2/2
Authority2/2
Currency—
Authorship & scope
Attribution (G4 evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuer authority (evidence)
No evidence recorded for this source.
Issuers, who it governs, legal force and content are on the full record.
Eligibility gates
G1 · Retrievablepass
Passed in screening.
G2 · AI nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G3 · Governance nexuspass
Passed in screening.
G4 · Attributablepass
Passed in screening.
G5 · In forcepass
Passed in screening.
Scored criteria
Actionability
2/2No rationale recorded.
Any use of GenAI chatbots or other generative AI tools by the judiciary and judicial staff must be consistent with the judiciary’s overarching obligation to protect the integrity of the administration of justice and court/tribunal processes.
Authority
2/2No rationale recorded.
Guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in Courts and Tribunals Judges, judicial officers, tribunal members and judicial support staff
Currency
—No rationale recorded.
Classification
Coverage topicGenerative AI in courts
PerspectiveRegulatory/legal
Lifecycle stage7 Use & impact
Layerhuman
GranularityNot recorded